RETH BLOG #3
Stop Sugarcoating It: The Hidden Danger in Baby Food No One Talks About
A mum who’s had enough
💔 The Real-Life Impact:
- 1 in 5 kids starting school are already overweight or obese.
- 12,000 under-fives are hospitalized each year in the UK for tooth extractions.
- Parents feel shocked, misled, and betrayed when they find out.
As a mum of two, I’ve done what most of us have — grabbed a pouch, read “no added sugar” and felt like I was doing something good for my baby.
But recently, I came across research that made my stomach turn.
The very brands we trust Ella’s Kitchen, Heinz, Piccolo, Little Freddie, Aldi, Lidl are selling us food that isn’t just underwhelming in nutrition... it could be actively harmful if used too often.
Here’s what the research shows:
And worst of all?
They’re marketed as healthy.
Words like “nutritionally balanced,” “immune support,” and “ideal first food” are slapped on labels that hide a sugar bomb inside. And I get it. I was one of them.
Free sugars released during puréeing are absorbed faster than whole fruit meaning bigger blood sugar spikes. But those sweet tastes shape your baby’s palate for life. It’s not just the sugar, it’s what they’re not getting: texture, chewing practice, iron, real savoury flavours, family food culture.
❗ What Parents Need to Know:
According to NHS Start for Life:
📣 It’s Time for Change
On June 24th, 2025, MPs debated the nutritional quality and marketing of baby foods. But voluntary guidance won’t cut it anymore.
We need:
Let’s stop assuming “organic” means “nutritious.”
Let’s stop normalizing sugar-filled baby food.
🖋 What You Can Do
But recently, I came across research that made my stomach turn.
The very brands we trust Ella’s Kitchen, Heinz, Piccolo, Little Freddie, Aldi, Lidl are selling us food that isn’t just underwhelming in nutrition... it could be actively harmful if used too often.
Here’s what the research shows:
- Some pouches have more sugar than a toddler should eat in an entire day.
- 89% of fruit pouches would get a high-sugar warning label under WHO guidelines.
- Many contain almost no iron or vitamin C vital nutrients for brain development and immunity.
- 41% of “meals” are basically dessert.
- Pouches encourage sucking, which is now directly linked to increased risk of tooth decay.
And worst of all?
They’re marketed as healthy.
Words like “nutritionally balanced,” “immune support,” and “ideal first food” are slapped on labels that hide a sugar bomb inside. And I get it. I was one of them.
“No added sugar” means nothing when the pouch is 90% puréed fruit.
Free sugars released during puréeing are absorbed faster than whole fruit meaning bigger blood sugar spikes. But those sweet tastes shape your baby’s palate for life. It’s not just the sugar, it’s what they’re not getting: texture, chewing practice, iron, real savoury flavours, family food culture.
❗ What Parents Need to Know:
According to NHS Start for Life:
- Wait until 6 months before introducing solids
- Pouches = occasional only (not daily)
- Spoon only — never let them suck from the spout
- Skip “baby snacks” entirely under 12 months
- After 12 months, stick to real meals and water
- No salt or sugar needed — your child doesn’t miss what they don’t know
📣 It’s Time for Change
On June 24th, 2025, MPs debated the nutritional quality and marketing of baby foods. But voluntary guidance won’t cut it anymore.
We need:
- Clear labeling
- Limits on sugar and salt
- Bans on misleading health claims
- Stronger regulations based on WHO standards
Let’s stop assuming “organic” means “nutritious.”
Let’s stop normalizing sugar-filled baby food.
🖋 What You Can Do
- Speak up. Share this info.
- Cook simple meals — babies don’t need gourmet, just real.
- Look for short ingredient lists and savoury options
- Push for better regulation and policies — because if parents are misled, children pay the price.
Let’s protect the next generation.
No more sugarcoating it ❗
Be the first to know when we post
